Argumentum in Absentia
19/07/2021- During the week of July 12-16, I have been teaching in the Critical Thinking course of the UAB Summer School. It has been an exhausting and very enriching week. After seeing the progress of the students, I can only feel happy with the work done.
23/06/2021- During the week of July 12-16, I will participate in the “Critical Thinking” course of the UAB Summer School. During the week, I will teach the notions of deduction, induction, and abduction in a not strictly professional context of philosophy. Through real and fictional cases, the intention is to show the strength and limits of the different facets of human reasoning without the need to fall into social clichés.
22/06/2021- Prof. Agustín Adúriz Bravo and I have been accepted to participate in the “IX Congreso Internacional sobre profesores de ciencias” (online) to be held October 13-15. Also, a special issue with the proceedings of the congress will be published soon in the journal Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis (link).
23/04/2021- I am very excited to announce that it has been published today: LOPEZ-ORELLANA, R., & SANS PINILLOS, A. (2021). Ronald Giere, ¿semanticista? Una pregunta provocativa para el debate contemporáneo sobre la representación científica. ArtefaCToS. Revista De Estudios Sobre La Ciencia Y La tecnología, 10(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.14201/art202110189106
09/04/2021 – I gave the talk “Argumentum in Absentia. Herencia y consecuencias de la inferencia abductiva en filosofía de la ciencia” in the Tertulias Filosóficas, organized by the Research Program in Philosophy and Mathematics, the Institute of Mathematical Engineering, and the Institute of Philosophy of the University of Valparaíso, Chile.
25/03/2021 – Now available for Open Access: Magnani, L., Pinillos, A.S. & Arfini, S. Language: The “Ultimate Artifact” to Build, Develop, and Update Worldviews. Topoi (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-021-09742-5
In “Argumentum in Absentia: The Role of Abduction in Philosophy of Science and its Prescriptive Value Dependency”, it is argued that abduction has a prescriptive aspect that has not yet been taken into account. The reasons lie in the fact that abduction has been investigated from the standpoint of the debates in philosophy of science, which not only determine the conceptual framework acting as a starting point of studies but also offer a closed conception of what is science, namely the one that goes into the debate in question. This interpretation of abduction is a pending task that, if it is not solved, then we would risk perpetuating a philosophical system that denies abduction itself. This situation is shown through the dichotomies that have shaped contemporary debates because abduction can only operate precisely when one accepts the relation between notions previously declared to be antagonistic.
The ideal starting point is the EC-Model from which the contemporary conception of abduction can be approached differently, which allows the incorporation of relevant cognitive elements to understand the multimodal aspect of this reasoning. On the other hand, the prescriptive element is based on James’ radical empiricism, which complements the EC-Model with a theoretical framework to raise a holistic (and not vicious) relationship between the values and the descriptions of the world. This conjunction offers an open and unfinished cosmovision, formed by the set of particular views of the world.
My current project is to demonstrate the hypothesis that abduction has a prescriptive aspect, which is essential for operating its full potential. I carry out this task in various ways, which are determined by the different official projects in which I collaborate.
From an epistemological perspective, I am investigating the role of abduction when facing uncertainty. In a figurative sense, I am interested in analyzing which is the last available link when you do not have tools to build the same path that you are walking. In these circumstances, it is more important to know how we want the world to be than to know how it is, and, here, the ethical gaze acquires an epistemological relevance.
I also work on this idea in more practical research. I am currently working on the prescriptive aspect of medical diagnosis. On the other hand, I also try to implement the prescriptive element of abduction in concrete design processes, in which different descriptions have to be adapted to individual wills which in turn, are regulated by the social impact of the final product obtained.
– Vallverdú, J., Sans Pinillos, A. (2022). Inevitable creativity. Human inquiry explained through the neuro-multimodality of abduction. In Magnani, L. (ed.), Handbook of Abductive Cognition. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
– Sans Pinillos, A. (2022). Distribution of cultural values through abduction in socially and culturally shared spaces. In Magnani, L. (ed.), Handbook of Abductive Cognition. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
– Sans Pinillos, A. (2021). Neglected Pragmatism. Discussing Abduction to Dissolute Classical Dichotomies. Foundations of Science.
– Sans Pinillos, A., Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2021). Un lugar para el razonamiento abductivo en la formación de profesores de ciencias. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis.
– Sans Pinillos, A. (2021). Distribución abductiva de los valores culturales: el proyecto de Alejandría. In Estany, A. y Gensollen, M. (eds.), Diseño institucional e innovaciones democráticas. Aguascalientes, México: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona-Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes.
– Sans Pinillos, A. & Magnani, L. (2021). I know that I know nothing: The self-awareness of ignorance as a tool for managing ignorance. In Magnani, L. & Arfini, S., eds.), Embodied, Extended, Ignorant Minds: New Studies on the Nature of Not-Knowing. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
– Sans Pinillos, A. (2021). Diferenciación entre la descripción y la prescripción en el Diagnóstico médico. Una aproximación desde el razonamiento abductivo. In casacuberta, D. y Estany, A. (coord.), Epistemología e innovación en medicina. Madrid: Editorial Plaza y Valdés.
– Sans, A. & Vallverdú, J. (2021). What #®¥§≠$@ is Creativity? Debats: Journal on culture, power and society, v. 135, 1.
* All the publications in this section are accepted texts that will come out soon. For this reason, not all the data are available yet.
My methodology is mainly based on staying motivated by establishing harmony between fascination, intuition and knowledge. Unlike some colleagues’ understanding of what research is, to me, knowledge has never been the central axis, but the regulative limit of my intuition. Precisely for this reason, knowledge is also a crutch, which offers a point of support for intuition.
By intuition, I mean the vague idea I have of the order of things and, based on them, also of its possibilities. There are concrete issues that I can only keep connected from this overview. Obviously, in the end, it is the investigation of the moment that determines if this is more or less possible. Still, intuition allows me to separate without eliminating those aspects that seem not to fit, but that seem relevant to me.
Finally, the fascination is the engine of my research. With it, I focus on those problems that interest me the most, and it allows me to find its roots in countless places. At times, it can become an obsession, and that is why it is necessary to control it with the intuited ideas that, in turn, are contrasted with the knowledge obtained from the current state of the research.
However, without the fascination I feel for my specific work and for philosophy in general, I would have no interest, not only in knowing what surrounds me but neither understanding and looking for alternatives for a better future.